Choosing a website for a task can take longer than the task itself. Search results mix useful tools with vague landing pages, and the detail that matters most may be whether a service requires an account, offers a particular feature or publishes enough information to judge it. WebDir is a web directory intended to make that early research more structured. It lets people search for sites or browse categories, then compare listings by features, access requirements and source-linked details.
The basic idea is not to replace trying a website. It is to help narrow down which ones are worth trying. WebDir is available on the web and is free to use. Its directory and search tools are aimed at people looking across areas such as design, finance, business, development and productivity.
Start with the task, not a site name
The landing page puts Ask SI near the centre of the experience. A visitor can describe what they want to do, rather than already knowing the name of a product to search for. The examples on the page suggest the kind of request it expects: a tool with a particular capability, or one that does not require signing up. From there, the directory is meant to help compare relevant sites.
That approach is useful when the problem is discovery, not evaluation of a shortlist you have already assembled. People who know what they want can also browse categories, new listings, top-rated sites and collections. The directory spans a broad range of subjects, so its main job is to help organise the initial search rather than specialise in one professional field.
The comparison promise is specific: look at features and access requirements alongside reviews linked to sources. That can make it easier to spot differences that a homepage search snippet leaves out. But a listing is still a starting point. Readers should follow its sources and check a site's own current terms before relying on details that could change.
What a score can and cannot tell you
WebDir describes its SI Score as an estimate of usefulness for a tool's intended task. The score is produced by AI judging the features and limits stated in the available material. The site says popularity does not contribute to the score, and that unsupported facts cannot support a high one. It also describes separate checks for matters such as policy links, trackers, response status and basic accessibility.
Those checks are not a substitute for using the product. WebDir explicitly says its usefulness score does not come from a hands-on task test. In practice, that means the score can help organise a scan of published information, but cannot establish whether a workflow feels good, whether an advertised feature works as expected or whether the tool suits a particular team's habits. Treat it as a research aid, not an independent verdict.
The source trail matters for the same reason. According to WebDir, listings draw on official pages when those can be read. When a listing relies on a saved catalogue record instead, it is marked accordingly and has a lower score ceiling. That is a helpful distinction, though it still leaves readers responsible for checking the underlying material and deciding how much confidence to place in it.
A directory, not a product trial
For someone looking to find websites across several categories, the value is convenience: search from a task, inspect comparable information and follow sources without starting from a blank search page. This is also where the service's limits are clearest. Its comparisons are based on written information, not a demonstrated test of each site. And although the catalogue covers many kinds of tools, the breadth does not guarantee that every niche need will have a strong or current listing.
WebDir says its selection changes regularly and that new sites can be added. Site owners can submit an address, after which the service says AI drafts a listing and human editors can review, refine or approve it. That describes a route for expanding the directory, not a guarantee that every listing has been tested in use. The distinction is important for anyone reading a score as more than a source-based estimate.
WebDir is best suited to people who want a first-pass website comparison and are willing to verify promising options themselves. It is a poor fit for anyone who needs proven performance, detailed hands-on reviews or a definitive recommendation without further checking. The useful promise is a more organised way to discover candidates, not certainty about which one to choose.
Compare 15,600+ websites side by side